Skip to main content

Full text of "President Saddam Hussein addresses Moslem ulema"

See other formats


President Saddam Hussein 
Addresses Moslem Ulema 



Dar al-Ma'mun- 












President Saddam Hussein 
Addresses Moslem Ulema 



Translated by 
Naji al-Hadithi 



Published by 
Dar al-Ma'mun for Translation and Publishing 

Baghdad - 1983 



Foreword 






<>**' 2 *V 
MAY 3 1 199C 




^ COPV . 




Under the motto, "For Common Action 
Consolidating Islamic Solidarity to Confront 
Dangers and Challenges", the First Popular Islamic 
Conference was held in Baghdad on April 14-17, 

1983. 

On behalf of President Saddam Hussein, Mr. Izzat 

Ibrahim, Vice-Chairman of the Revolution Command 
Council, opened the Conference with a 
speech that called for more cooperation and, 
coordination among Muslems to face up to the new 
challenges and threats besetting the Arab and 
Muslem world as a whole. 

President Hussein himself attended one of the 
sessions and addressed the Conference on the 
lraq~lran conflict expressing Iraq's agreement to 
whatever the Conference may decide in this 
respect. 



■ 



The Conference was attended by more than 280 
of MusJem Ulema (Scholars) from more than 50 
countries. 

The Conference took three decisions on Islamic 
solidarity, the Iraq-Iran war and the Palestinian 
question. 

On the Iraq-fran war, the Conference called on the 
governments of both countries to observe an 
immediate ceasefire and pull their forces back to 
international borders. It also formed a Peace and 
Reconciliation Committee of 9 well-known Ulema 
from 9 Muslem countries. 

The Conference as well as its Peace and 
Reconciliation Committee expressed regret at the 
Iranian government's negative attitude towards the 
Conference and its efforts aimed at solving the 
conflict between the two Muslem countries. 

This book contains the speech delivered by 
President Saddam Hussein and the opening 
ceremony speech by the Vice-Chairman of the 
Revolution Command Council. 



President Saddam Hussein's Address to the 
Popular islamic Conference held in Baghdad 

On April 14 -17, 1983 



10 





Dear Brothers, 

With great pleasure, Baghdad embraces you as 
Ulema, Imams and good brothers who have come 

from various parts of the globe to say what you 
consider useful, appropriate and right. 

You are welcome. 

It was my desire to attend your Conference at an 
earlier stage. But it seems that the brothers in Iran 
had timed their offensive with your Conference. As 
you know, when the men sacrifice their noble blood 
in defence of their honour and their land with all its 
sanctuaries, it is our duty to be with them. Hence, 
our attendance of your Conference to hear what you 
say and to let you hear what we think appropriate, 
has been delayed. 

However, Brother Izzat Ibrahim the Vice-Chairman 
has undertaken the task with the speech which^ou 

i j 



have heard and which represents our view and that 
of the leadership and the government as well as of 
the Iraqi people. I know that you have decided to 
send invitation to the Ulema of Iran. Well done. It is a 
religious law that, when circumstances permit, the 
Muslims, should hear both parties to know where 
the right is, where the truth is. 

We, on our part, have no prejudice against any 
logical. Islamic, human view. We believe that your 
decision carries all these implications-the logical. 
the Islamic and the human. Despite the fact that we 
are now in a state of war. we hereby declare that we 
agree to and are prepared for hosting 
Khomeini himself in this Conference. Though this 
may be out of keeping with international traditions, it 
is not against our Arab and Islamic standards. We 
are ready to host Khomeini himself in this 
Conference as had this people and land hosted htm 
for fourteen years. Perhaps hosting him again will 
remind him of the first time he was received in Iraq, 
and will offer a chance of good, love and peace for 
all. 

Moreover, and perhaps contrary to recognised 
traditions in terms of international norms and the 
responsibility of states and rulers, I would say, from 

14 




the highest authority in the State, we agree on every 
decision you take. 

I may apologise to the Iraqi people, the scholars of 
international law, and those involved in politics and 
legislature, for they may criticise Saddam Hussein 
and say how a Head of State can agree in advance 
to something he has not yet read or seen or known. I 
would say to this criticism that when such a 
gathering of good men who have come from all 
parts of the globe, representing Muslims, are in 
concensus on an opinion, it must be the right one. 
Even if we have a different opinion we do not think 
that ours would be sounder than that of all this 
gathering. 

If everyone of us substituted his own interpretation 
for the interpretations of others, it would be 
impossible for him to meet, integrate and or interact 
with others. The history of Muslims and the relations 
of their old leaders, thinkers and commanders 
including the relationship between the Muslim's 
leaders and the great Messenger Mohammed serve 
as a good example guiding us to the right path. 

Wc all know that the great Messenger, before 
deciding on something, used to consult his 
brothers, the Companions. The history of Islam tells 

15 



us that the Companions used to ask the Messenger 
if that view was ordained by God or.was his own. If 
he said it was his own opinion they would discuss it 
with him, and the Messenger's view, after 
discussion, would sometimes be replaced by that of 
one of the Companions. 

Iraq has nothing hidden or deceitful which it fears 
it may be uncovered or exposed. Iraq wants to be 
secure; and we do not think that the Muslims 
meeting in this place or any where else do not want 
Iraq to be secure. Iraq seeks the respect of its 
international borders; and we do not think that you 
want Iraqi territory to be occupied by anybody 
whatsoever. Iraq wants a ceasefire. It wants peace. 
When these constitute the declared and undeclared 
points of ail that fraq seeks, we do not think that a 
Muslim in this place or anywhere else will come 
forward with an opposing stand, because this is 
right and logical; it is a self-evident state of affairs. 
Hence, we say in advance that we agree to 
whatever is decided by the Muslims in whatever 
form it may be expressed. It is on this basis that we 
proposed arbitration in the Islamic Summit 
Conference of Taif. We also proposed this to all 
international organisations. We said to the Iranian 

16 



• 



officials if they wanted arbitration by oth^r states 
under international law they might so choose, and if 
they wanted arbitration by Muslims they might so 
choose as well. 

However, Brothers, despite the bitterness of 
attitudes and behaviour, we have maintained our 
balance in view of the principles we hold and 
respect. We have not maltreated a prisoner of war, 
nor have we maltreated a woman or a child. We 
have even refrained from striking at any target 
unless compelled. 

They started the war by shelling peaceful towns, 
and when the Almighty God granted us success in 
repelling their aggression and driving their army 
back, we were in a depth sufficient to protect our 
border towns which are very close to the borders. 

Basra is a big town second only to Baghdad. It is 
an industrial centre, and our only port on the Gulf. It 
is just over 20 kilometres from the borders. 
However, when we felt that it was the Muslims' 
opinion that we should pull back from Iran's 
territories, and despite our argument that if we 
pulled back to the borders the Iranian artillery would 
resume its shelling of our towns as it had done at the 
beginning of the war, we decided to comply with the 

17 



Muslims' view and world public opinion. We even 
respected the Iranian popular opinion. 

When we pulled back to the borders, Iran's artillery 
resumed its daily bombardment of our towns. 

Nevertheless, we now and then make appeals and 
issue warnings to Iran, so that our army shall not be 
obliged to retaliate. 

Whenever we made an appeal for peace, some 
people imagined or had the illusion that it stemmed 
from weakness. Which was never the case, and the 
proof lies in the present conditions which are visible 
to all. 

Judging by the simplest forms of reason and the 
simplest values of Islam, the Iranian rulers should 
ask themselves: "How could Iraq, whose population 
is one-fourth of that of Iran and whose land has so 
insufficient depth that Iran's planes can cover the 
whole of Iraq because of its smaller area and their 
artillery can hit many Iraqi towns-which it is actually 
doing everyday-how could Iraq achieve victory over 
their expansionist and aggressive dreams? Those 
officials should have asked themselves this 
question and answered it wisely and directly that the 
right was obviously not on their side. 

However, victory, as one of our brother Egyptian 

18 



Ulemas has said, cannot lead us astray, and 
capability conjoined to right cannot lead us to 
conceit. The earlier peace can be achieved, the 
better. A month's delay may cost the precious life of 
one more person. 

Baghdad is your city. It is a meeting place for you. 
It is well-known that you do not yield to or flatter a 
ruler at the expense of what is right, whether in your 
countries proper or outside them. Baghdad is 
therefore a meeting place for Muslims to say 
whatever they deem right, appropriate and 

legitimate. 

At any rate, your place in our souls and in our 
hearts shall remain high as ever. 

Again, we welcome you. We wish you success and 
all that enhances dignity, honour, security and 
stability to yourselves all and those around you. We 
trust we shall always see you well. 

Peace be upon you. 



19 







President Saddam Hussein's 

inaugural speech delivered 

by 








Mr. Izzat Ibrahim 




Vice-Chalrman of the 




Revolution Command Council 






20 




21 











In the name of God, 

The Merciful, the Compassionate, 

Dear Ulema and Religious Figures 
Members of the First Popular Islamic 
Conference, 

On behalf of President Saddam Hussein and on 
behalf of Iraq, Leadership and people, I welcome 
you in Baghdad, the city of peace, wishing your 
Conference success in bringing about all that you 
seek for the pride and well-being of Muslims and for 
the promotion of the values of good, love and peace 
among them. 



22 23 



Brothers, 



A particular importance is attached to your 
Conference in view of two facts. The first is your 
positive response, from the prominent position you 
occupy among Muslims, to the call for remedying 
the rift, treating the reasons of decline in the 
Muslims' life and establishing solidarity and 
cooperation among them along the path of the.r 
good at a time when our enemies, the Zionists and 
their collaborators intensify their attempts to 
fragment our ranks and weaken our unity. 

The second fact is the popular aspect of this 
Conference and its expression of the opinion of 
Muslims in many countries of the world, who, 
together with their governments, have become 
alarmed and concerned for the dangers besetting 
Muslims and for the crises they are suffering from- 

24 



which have in certain cases reached the level of 
lengthy war as is the case with what is taking place 
in our region. 

Your Conference is therefore, a live demonstration 
of the islamic consensus on the necessity for 
serious and joint action to ward off dangers posing a 
threat to Muslims and to their solidarity and unity 
against the challenges they are facing; and to work 
on restoring rapprochement and fraternity to their 
ranks. 

In keeping away from engagement in differences 
and settling their disputes, the Muslims, with their 
human potentialities, material resources and 
spiritual forces will be able to take a positive role not 
only to the advantage of the Islamic peoples but 
also to that of mankind at large. 

Such a role is inspired by the glorious Islamic 
Message, It will be a renewal of the great historical 
role which the Muslims have performed during their 
golden eras, when they have contributed to 
civilisation and to mankind progress. The Muslims 
were able to offer mankind all this rich contribution 
in various aspects of science, knowledge, thought 
and civilisation, as a result of the sense of 
positiveness, cooperation, and openness they have 

25 



no doubt derived from Islam's human and open- 
minded view which is based on good, peace> and 
tolerance towards and cooperation with the 
followers of other divine religions. 

The Muslims are called upon today to follow the 
example of their forefathers so as to restore that 
glory to their present; to contribute to the progress 
of their societies and to the civilisation of the modern 
world; and to deepen its spiritual basis in the light of 
the teachings of love, cooperation and fraternity. 

If the Muslims had in the past made such a 
contribution to civilisation and such a performance 
in meeting the requirements of the noble divine 
Message as a result of their fraternity and 
cooperation along the path of good, they will not be 
able to do the same now if they will not discard the 
reasons of division and disagreement, and opt for 
tolerance, cooperation and peace. 

Brothers, 
Great Ulema, 






Thirty months have now passed on this destructive 
war which is raging between two neighbours 
connected with many well-known bonds. Such 
bonds are supposedly a safeguard against conflict 
and losses between the two countries so that they 
can provide the necessary potentialities for 
construction and prosperity of their peoples, and 
encounter the dangers of Zionism which has taken 
advantage of the war and the persistence in 
continuing it to perpetrate its crimes, whether in 
invading Lebanon and massacring the Palestinians 
and the Lebanese, or in launching aggression 
against the Iraqi nuclear reactor which was built for 
peaceful and construction purposes. 

It is strange indeed that the path of peace and 
sparing innocent people's blood is quite clear to all 
sensible people, but some avoid it for reasons of 
arrogance and persistence in aggression. Such an 
attitude is a breach to the teachings of Islam, the 
values of heaven and the laws of earth. 







You, must have been hurt and concerned for what 
is taking place in our region as a result of the war 
between Iraq and Iran. 




Brothers 

You have come to Baghdad, the city of peace and 
the bastion of the noble Islamic values, as dear 


26 




27 



guests to its people, where you are holding your 
Conference now. However, Baghdad will not be 
pleased that you should be biased to the Iraqi point 
of view in your discussions, resolutions and 
recommendations at the expense of right and 
justice - far be it from you that you so do. What 
naghdad seeks that you hear what we say and 
give it your judgements on the basis of the 
pr.nciples of Sharia', justice and fairness. 

You are no doubt aware of the fact that both Iraq 
and Iran are accusing each other of starting 
aggression and war, and that we have our own 
evidence and proofs on the conditions and reasons 
which had led to the eruption of the war, which we 
submitted to the Islamic Conference of Al-Taif. 
Saudi Arabia. Since you are our guests now, we 
shall not take advantage of your presence here to 
burden you with our views. Nor shall we give such 
view a greater chance of presentation than it would 
have should the other party were present. 

What we would say, brothers, is that we have 
written to the late King Khalid in his capacity as the 
Chairman of the Islamic Conference Organisation 
and to President Ahmed Sekou Toure in his capacity 
as the Chairman of Islamic Good Will Mission 

28 



requesting the judgement of Muslims in the question 
of who started aggression and war, and 
consequently in settling differences between Iraq 
and Iran. 

You may appreciate our position expressed 
through this initiative. If so is the attitude to the 
question of who started aggression and war, it is 
quite clear to every fair-minded person that it is 
Iran's regime which persists in continuing the war. 
Its successive attacks on Iraq, the statements of its 
officials and its official attitudes to the issue serve as 
ample evidence of its persistence in continuing war 
and aggression. 

As for Iraq's attitude to the continuation of war it is 
quite clear. Since the first week of the war, Iraq has 
relentlessly sought peace. We have called for a 
ceasefire and offered Iran peace on September 28, 
1980. We have accepted the United Nations 
Security Council's resolutions of September 28, 
1980, July 12, 1982 and October 4, 1982. Moreover, 
we have unilaterally observed a ceasefire from 
October 5-8, 1980 in response to an appeal by 
President of Pakistan, Zia-ul-Haq who was making 
good will efforts in his capacity as Chairman of the 
Islamic Conference Organisation at the time. 



29 



Iraq has taken opportunity of various holy religious 
occasions to reiterate its call for Peace and its 
desire for a ceasefire. It has relentlessly sought an 
end to bloodshed through those initiatives while the 
other side was so involved in aggression that it was 
escalating fighting and making large human 
deployments with a view to occupying our towns 
and territories. Iraq's attitude towards the exchange 
o\ visits by the families of the prisoners of war is 
quite clear. It was exhausted by the evasive 
attempts, manoeuvres and pretexts made by the 
other side to undermine this initiative and bring it to 
failure. Even the international and Islamic parties 
mediating to facilitate the visits have despaired of 
reaching a result because of the rejection and 
manoeuvres which faced their efforts 

Instead of responding to those initiatives, the 
rulers of Iran committed an act which constituted a 
Iragrant breach to all concepts of Islam when they 
executed many Iraqi prisoners of war. They have 
also withheld the names of other prisoners of war 
from the International Red Cross Committee, thus 
causing many complex consequences to their 
families in terms of inheritance and marriage 
because of these families' ignorance of the fate of 

30 



their sons whether they are still alive or dead. 

As for the Iranian children who were pushed into 
fighting by the rulers of Iran with total disregard to 
all religious and human values, and who had fallen 
prisoner to Iraq forces, Iraq has done its best to 
return them to their families. Similar efforts were 
made by international organisations and parties 
without any result but the persistence of those rulers 
in refusing the return of those innocent children to 
their families. 

Ever since the start of the war, Iraq has 
cooperated in a positive and highly responsible 
manner with all international and Islamic efforts, in 
particular, to settle the dispute and put an end to 
fighting. It has positively responded to all mediation 
efforts by the United Nations, the Islamic 
Conference Organisation, the Non-aligned 
Movement and all other mediation efforts aimed at 
stopping the fighting and reaching a peaceful 
settlement for the conflict on the bases of respect of 
sovereignty; non-interference in internal affairs; and 
international treaties, conventions and laws. 

In the Seventh Non-aligned Summit Conference of 
New Delhi, Iraq has proposed that an arbitration 
committee should be formed to determine the 

31 



responsibility of the party starting the war, and the 
party responsible for the continuation of the armed 
conflict for all this period in order to reach practical 
results with a view to stopping war, and punishing 
the aggresor which rejects these results. 

Iran has of course refused this-which is a further 
point exposing the aggressor and underlining its 
persistence in continuing its aggression. 

As is well-known to all, the rulers of Iran try to 
impose arbitrary conditions to end the war. They 
also try to use an Islamic cover for their arbitrary 
conditions. 

In rejecting these unfair conditions, Iraq is in tact, 
acting in line with the principles of Islam and 
international law, and with the right of peoples to 
sovereignty, independence and dignity. Such 
arbitrary conditions obviously serve as yet another 
proof of the persistence in continuing war and the 
intentions of aggression and expansionism. 

Thus, brothers, you realise the efforts made by 
Iraq to stop this war which was imposed on it, as 
well as the serious measures it has taken to avoid its 
evil consequences... All our fierce fighting whose 
news you have been following is merely for 
defending ourselves, our honour and our land. 

32 






There was no need for such great sacrifices if not for 
the persistence of the aggressor in its aggression. 
For, we want, as you and the whole world know, 
these potentialities to be oriented towards the 
construction of our country and to the realisation of 
our people's aspirations for progress and 
prosperity. 

The progress enjoyed by Iraq serves as clear 
evidence of the determination of its people to lead a 
new dignified life which is worthy of human being, 
and abundant with all facilities of creativity and 
innovation. It also serves as yet another proof of the 
need of the Iraqi people for peace which provides 
an opportunity to carry on the process of 
construction and the performance of its national and 
human role. 

The great Ufema will no doubt be able to be 
acquainted with certain aspects of this revival so 
that they can judge whether a people with such 
objectives and efforts can slip into war or be 
pleased with it. 

Brothers, 

If our people was forced to enter war, it so did in 

33 



defence of its land, honour, dignity, present and 
future - which is a duty ordained by both positive 
and divine laws. 

Brothers, Members of the Conference, 

The tasks of building up our new society on the 
basis of justice, equality and the provision of good 
life for the Iraqi people, as well as the tasks 
shouldered by Iraq on the national (Arab) and 
Islamic levels and in the field of combating the plans 
of Zionism and colonialism are not easy tasks. 
Rather they demand great efforts and potentialities. 
The war undoubtedly obstructs and paralyses such 
efforts. Triggering war by any party whatsoever is a 
contribution to obstructing the process of 
construction and progress, as well as an attempt to 
undermine the state of revival which has been 
introduced by the July Revolution 1968. 

Before God, our people, our Arab nation and the 
magnanimous Islamic teachings, we realise our 
responsibility for protecting the course of revival 
and the aspirations of our people for advanced life 
whereby it can contribute, together with other 
nations, to making progress and to establishing the 

J4 



values of justice, equality, good and love which 
were preached by the great Islam. 

Therefore, it is iflogical that Iraq should opt for 
engaging itself in battles which would drain its 
resources; exhaust of building up its new society, 
and its national (Arab) and human role. 

We give priority for the protection of our people, of 
the achievements of our Revolution and of the 
process of our revival in whatever step we take. 
However, we have used all means of self-discipline 
and wisdom to avoid war, and sought to stop it after 
it had erupted. But the other side has been 
persistent in continuing aggression opting for 
nothing but hatred, with total disregard to the 
meaning of neighbourliness and to the values of 
Islam. 

Despite the clarity of the situation for all Muslims - 
Ulema, Scholars and general public - they, 
including the Iraqis, look forward for your" 
Conference, which is attended by the noble Ulema 
and religious dignitaries, to say its word, shoulder its 
responsibility and contribute to reaching a 
settlement for this ferocious war, in accordance with 
what is ordained by the Shari'a of Islam. 

With their enlightened vision and their realisation of 

35 



the huge losses and damage sustained by Muslims 
as a result of the fighting between two Islamic 
neighbours, the Muslim Ulema who responded to 
holding this Conference have to shoulder the 
serious tasks of seeking a just settlement ensuring 
the legitimate rights of both countries and putting an 
end to this bleeding. The key and the first step 
towards this serious effort is a ceasefire to avoid 
further bloodshed. 

Brothers, 

The divine law calls on all Muslims to work on 
preventing Muslims' bloodshed and putting an end 
to the aggressor's acts, as is stated in the Holy 
Quran that if two parties of the faithful are fighting 
each other, Muslims should try to solve their 
dispute, but if one of them commits aggression 
against the other, they should fight the aggressor 
until it heeds to God's ordinance. 

Our belief in the principles of right and justice and 
our sense of responsibility before Muslims call for us 
all to seek truth as a step to reaching an objective 
and just settlement based on principles in order to 
achieve peace and establish principles of good 

36 



neighbourliness of Islam and of international norms 
and conventions. 

Brothers, 

Members of the Conference, 

It is quite surprising for every sincere Muslim that 
the Arabs and Muslims, with all their great resources 
and all the clarity of their right are not fully able to 
stop the Zionist aggression. This is no doubt due to 
the state of decline and disagreement prevailing 
among them and fragmenting their power. After the 
criminal Zionists had invaded Lebanon; participated 
in and prepared for the massacres of the Palestinian 
Refugee Camps of Sabra and Chatilla; massacred 
the resistance fighters; killed innocent aged 
persons, women and children; set farms ablaze; 
and destroyed towns, they have persisted in 
continuing their occupation and procrastinated in 
withdrawing their forces. They are even trying to 
distract attention away from their crimes in Lebanon 
through committing crimes of poisoning over a 
thousand of male and female students in the 
occupied territories with total disregard to human 

37 



conscience and ethics. 

What outrages and exacerbates Muslims is that 
this criminal act is reported to have been designed 
to inflict sterility upon the Palestinians-which IS part 
of the Zionist plan of genocide against the 

Palestinian people. 

Behind such continuing Zionist aggression is no 
doubt the unlimited political, military and financial 
support rendered to the Zionist entity by the 
colonialism. Without such aid the Zionists would not 
be able to launch aggression against Arabs and 
Muslims, nor would they adopt such a reckless 
attitude to the will of the international community and 
to the resolutions of the United Nations and the 

Security Council. 

The Arabs and Muslims are called upon to 
confront the crimes of Zionism and to stop its 
aggression against the holy places especially the 
Holy Quds against which it seeks to apply a policy 
of judaisation whereby its Arab and Islamic features 
are to be removed and deformed. They are also 
called upon to encounter the methods of genocide 
practised by Zionism against the Palestinian people 
through denying it the simplest human rights, 

expropriating its property and driving it out. 

38 



There is ample evidence that the Zionist entity, 
with the help of colonialism and Islam's enemies, is 
still planning for stirring unrest in Islamic and Arab 
countries in particular In so doing, it aims at 
facilitating the fragmentation of these countries into 
yet weaker and more fragmented entities; 
establishing sectarian and racialist entities there; 
and striking at the unity and consensus of Muslims 
so as to impose its influence and realise its covetous 
ambitions and those of its colonialist masters. 

The Zionist entity has found in this destructive war 
(between Iraq and Iran) a golden chance to put its 
plan into action. The events of war have proved this 
- which, together with other factors have prompted 
Iraq to demand, and have confirmed its desire for 
an end to the war so that it can shoulder its national 
(Arab) and Islamic tasks in confronting Zionism and 
challenging its plans. 



Your Eminence, 

We highly appreciate your great concern for the 
unity of Muslims and your legitimate worry over the 
continuation of war between Iraq and Iran, which is 
used by the enemies and the Zionists in particular, 

39 



to realise new chapters in their conspiracy against 
the Arabs and Muslims and their expansionist 
dreams, and make expansion at the expense of the 
Arab nation and its rights. 

As you have met in the land of good and holy 
places, we hope that the Almighty will grant you 
levelheadedness to realise the noble aims for which 
you have met, and to reach positive results for the 
good of Islam and Muslims and for patching up the 
rift which poses a great threat to their existence and 
to their unity. 

"Say work, God will see your work, as will His 
Messenger and the faithful" 

The Holy Quran. 



May God grant you success. 



Peace be upon you. 



40 



( J Hi 'irfr f> 1 J i *"> (jxxJjjJI J-Jx-uJI 

J| ^j-Jx-u^. aljx-s J J US J I ^jjujjjJI J_1j.xjJI »»jLk>_k 

£l3j£1 j^£jJ tJJUjJ-^. aIJx-Tt .jxjJJjJI J-ix.uJI ul^^i 



41 



jJ&Mj 5«.jjU ij^dUl j|j jljx-al 



43 






^ : K-.yi JLxJbJI 



AL - HUR1A PRINTING HOUSE